Categories
Faith Torah

The Ten Commandments (they are not suggestions) – #10 (Do Not Covet)

This is an excerpt from my book, GRAFTED: Embracing Torah, which can be purchased on Amazon.

Enjoy!

The Ten Commandments (The Big Ones)

And God (Elohim) spake all these words, saying, (Exodus 20:1)

Exodus 19:25 states, “So Moses went down unto the people,
and spake unto them.” This is the third time Moses came down from
Mount Sinai (between Exodus 19:3 and Exodus 34:29, Moses goes
up to meet Elohim atop Mount Sinai and comes back down seven
times – not bad for an eighty-year-old guy).

The verse following Exodus 19:25 (Exodus 20:1) states, “God
spake all these words…” so it appears Elohim audibly spoke to all the Israelites.

This seems to be confirmed in verses 18–22:

18 And all the people saw the thunderings, and the lightnings, and the noise of the trumpet, and the mountain smoking: and when the people saw it, they removed, and stood afar off. 19 And they said unto Moses, Speak thou with us, and we will hear: but let not God speak with us, lest we die. 20 And Moses said unto the people, Fear not: for God is come to prove you, and that his fear may be before your faces, that ye sin not. 21 And the people stood afar off, and Moses drew near unto the thick darkness where God was. 22 And the LORD said unto Moses, Thus thou shalt say unto the children of Israel, Ye have seen that I have talked with you from heaven.

The people in the valley were so shaken by the experience that
they did not want Elohim to speak to them again (I’m sure there was
a lot of reverb and pyrotechnics). The word Elohim is used because
His Message was for more than just the Israelites. This tells me that
what we refer to as the Ten Commandments are so important that
Elohim felt the need to personally tell them to His people. This is
why I wanted to start with them.

10. “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt
not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant, nor
his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing
that is thy neighbour’s” (Exodus 20:17).

Envy is like a gateway drug: left unchecked, it can lead to any number of sins. King David comes to mind again. He committed adultery with Bathsheba and murdered her husband, Uriah. But it started with David watching Bathsheba from afar and desiring her greatly. As king, he could have had any woman in the kingdom he desired, but envy caused him to covet his neighbor’s wife.

Cain murdered his brother, Abel, because he was envious that God preferred Abel’s sacrifice over his own. The murder did not take place at the sacrifice, but the seeds of vengeance were planted at that time.

Wanting what your neighbor has is not necessarily a sin. If they have a riding mower and you are still pushing a mower over your two-acre lot, then you are naturally going to want what they have or something similar. If you go about doing the right things to get your own riding mower, then it is a good thing. In this case, desire sets a goal for you to achieve. You don’t want their actual mower but something similar.

If you sneak over and steal their mower and then paint it so that you can claim it is not theirs, then you have crossed an ugly line that used to be a barrier to you, but is now only a minor obstacle that you can readily cross again in the future. In the same way, if you sneak over and sabotage their riding mower so that they will be as equally miserable as you are pushing a mower over their lot, then you have let envy begin to tear down the fabric of your society.

The story of the two families driving past a mansion is illustrative. One family drives past the mansion, and the parents tell their children, “Look at that big house. It’s much too big for what they need. They should not be allowed to waste money so frivolously.” The second family drives past the same house, and the parents tell their children, “Look at that big house. If you work hard and save your money, then you will be able to afford a big house someday.”

The story is oversimplified and not very realistic (lots of people work hard and save their money but cannot afford a mansion), but it does demonstrate the two mindsets.

Socialism is the ideology of envy. “Don’t think it’s fair that others have more than you?” Your leaders will take what the rich have (this class of people will eventually include the not-so-rich, the “doing okay,” and finally the “barely scraping by” as the leaders drain more and more wealth from its citizens) and give it to others (the “poor”).

Socialism breaks down the entrepreneurial spirit because no one will want to work harder for more because it will be taken away. In the end, people stop working because they know that someone else’s labor will provide for them. At this point, people must be forced to work, and those who cannot produce must be eradicated because they are a drain on the economy (the Nazis referred to them as “useless eaters”).

This is why socialism always fails, and the results are devastatingly deadly. Everyone becomes equally miserable, except for the leaders who impose socialism but exempt themselves from its deprivations. The only way to maintain the system is through force and murder.

The Greatest Commandment?

Jesus was asked which is the greatest Commandment (Mark 12:28–34):

28 And one of the scribes came, and having heard them reasoning together, and perceiving that he had answered them well, asked him, Which is the first commandment of all? 29 And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: 30 And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment. 31 And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these. 32 And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he: 33 And to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the soul, and with all the strength, and to love his neighbour as himself, is more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices. 34 And when Jesus saw that he answered discreetly, he said unto him, Thou art not far from the kingdom of God. And no man after that durst ask him any question.

Yeshua was quoting from Deuteronomy 6:4-5, so we know that the Commandments given in Exodus are still relevant today. The Word differentiates between the “works of the flesh”

19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, 20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, 21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.

(Galatians 5:19–21)

and the “fruit of the Spirit”

22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, 23 Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law. 24 And they that are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts. 25 If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit. 26 Let us not be desirous of vain glory, provoking
one another, envying one another.

(Galatians 5:22–26)

Our walk, based on keeping the Commandments and the rest of the Torah, helps us to manifest the Spirit.

[1st Commandment – No Other Gods]

[2d Commandment – No Graven Images]

[3d Commandment – Taking the Name of Yahweh in Vain]

[4th Commandment – Keep the Sabbath Holy]

The first four Commandments are considered to be vital to our relationship with Elohim. The last six Commandments concern our relationship with others. This is why, when asked what the greatest commandment is, Yeshua is able to embody all ten in his short answer:

37 Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 38 This is the first and great commandment. 39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

(Matthew 22:37–39)

[5th Commandment – Honor Your Father and Mother]

[6th Commandment – Do Not Murder]

[7th Commandment – No Adultery]

[8th Commandment – Do Not Steal]

[9th Commandment – Do Not Swear Falsely]

[10th Commandment – Do Not Covet]

Categories
Politics Prescribed Holy Days

Do You Remember?

As today is the last day of Sukkot (Festival of Booths), I wondered how does one retain the memory of an event that occurred 3500 years ago?

Sukkot commemorates the release of Israel (and others) from bondage in Egypt and Yahweh’s protection of them as they traveled to the Promised Land.  Can you name another event that is over 3000 years old that is memorialized by so many people?

Most of history fades and we fail to learn from the past.

Young people today are not taught the past and therefore are doomed to repeat it.  They embrace socialism because they are taught that capitalism is wicked – ignoring that capitalism is responsible for the life of relative ease and wealth (as compared to everyday life before the great innovators of the industrial period . . . that only happened in countries that embraced capitalism) and that socialism has always lead to extreme poverty and genocide.

We are not talking ancient history.  The evils of Hitler (12 million killed), Stalin (30 million killed), Mao (70 million killed), and Pol Pot (2 million – one-third of his population!) were all committed less than 100 years ago.  The evils of Castro, Chavez, and the Kims in Korea still exist today!

It is not that it hasn’t been done correctly, or by the right people, planned societies always fail because a central government cannot plan for every individual.  Where they do not fail is in the accumulation of wealth and power in the people who administer the government.  This is where the appeal comes from – those that cannot earn a fortune by producing goods and/or services that people want can grow rich by forcibly making you do what they want and buy what they want you to buy.

The people fleeing other countries and flooding across our border are not hoping we embrace socialism, they risked their lives and suffered great hardship to escape the effects of socialism in the countries they came from.

The contrast is best made by the photo of the two Koreas at night. 

One embraced socialism and the other embraced capitalism.  They are the same people with the same customs and history, but one manifests freedom and prosperity while the other manifests oppression, poverty, and hunger (except for the elites, who live and eat well).

Democrats are fervently trying to destroy and/or tarnish the history of this country so that people cannot make learned decisions about their future. 

When Democrats state that America’s original sin is slavery, they want you to think that America was the only country that embraced slavery rather than acknowledging that every country at the time embraced some form of slavery (including the people that inhabited the land that eventually became the USA). Many countries, including some in Africa, still embrace slavery.

Democrats state that the Constitution legalized slavery, but they fail to acknowledge that the U.S. Constitution, which did not ban slavery, did ban the importation of slaves, which was an important first step to the abolition of slavery. 

Democrats fail to acknowledge that slavery was abolished in the Northern, Republican states (the Republican Party was formed to abolish slavery) and that over 600,000 people would have to die in a civil war to force the Southern, Democratic states to free their slaves.

When Democrats state that Republicans want to suppress the Black vote through voter integrity laws, they fail to acknowledge that Republicans passed the Constitutional amendments that gave newly-freed Blacks the right to vote (with zero Democratic votes), while Democrats formed the Ku Klux Klan and enacted “Jim Crow” laws to suppress the ability of Blacks to vote.

Destroying statues of Civil War leaders is important to them because they are a remembrance that Democrats fought to maintain slavery.  They want to obliterate the remembrance of their history of absolute authority and accumulation of wealth through the efforts of others. 

How is this different from the Chinese model of today?

The elites want you to embrace China because they make the cellphones (and most other items) you cannot live without.  The elites want to emulate China, because the Chinese do not have to run for election in order to rule.

Before they can do that, they need to ensure you do not know of the atrocities, both past and present, of the Chinese Communist Party (like using slave labor to make many of the items our youth cannot live without) – atrocities that will be replicated in this country (and every country that adopts authoritarian rule) if we do not learn from the Chinese, Nazi, Soviet, Korean, Cuban (and many more) models.

How do we promote the memory of things and events . . . especially ones we have not lived through?  Do we have to live through troubled times in order to remember what troubled times are like?

This is impractical, dangerous, and often ineffectual. 

People often have false memories of something that happened in their life.  Even large groups of people will have the same false memory, which is called the “Mandela Effect”.

Blogger Fiona Broome coined the phrase “Mandela effect” in 2009. While attending a conference, she discussed the tragic passing of Nelson Mandela in the 1980s. Many people she spoke to also recalled the South African president dying in prison, and some even remembered watching news coverage of the event on TV. But Mandela was very much alive at the time of the conference, and when he died four years later in 2013, he was a free man.

According to Broome, the Mandela effect is defined as a false memory shared by multiple people. Though it seems like a freak occurrence, instances of the phenomenon are fairly widespread. Do you remember the Berenstein Bears from your childhood? How about the movie Shazam starring Sinbad as a genie? Or the iconic Star Wars (1977) line “Luke, I am your father?”

Psychologists blame the Mandela effect on the way our brains record and retrieve information. Memories aren’t perfect snapshots of moments as they occurred in real life. When we recall something, we may only have access to part of the true story, so our brains pull relevant information from different memories to fill in the gaps.

https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/649001/what-is-the-mandela-effect

One would think that especially traumatic event would reinforce memory, but this is not necessarily the case.

Many soldiers suffer from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) because of the horrific nature of war.  After Desert Storm, I suffered from ‘night terrors’ from the events I witnessed in combat.  I had vivid recollections of the battle at the Jalibah airfield, but decades later, my brother found a paper online that I wrote for the Infantry School about my unit’s involvement in the battle. 

Shortly after the war, I was assigned to investigate the fratricide that took place (which was a huge conflict of interest since my unit was one of the victims).  At the same time, all the field grade officers had been brought together to discuss the events (but none of the people that were fired upon were invited).  I knew a cover-up was taking place (which seemed odd since stupid stuff regularly happens in the ‘fog of war’).

I saved a copy of my report and submitted it to the Infantry school the following year because they had expressed an interest in printing it in the Infantry magazine.  I thought there were some important lessons in the action, but the magazine never used the article, and I went on with life.

Many years later, when my brother posted the article online, I reread it with incredulity . . . I did not remember the facts as they were printed, but they must have been correct, because I wrote them down shortly after the event.

Memories are both wonderful and wicked.  I have many, many fond memories of my life, siblings, parents, and friends.  Not everyone has had such a blessed life and their memories evoke pain and tears.  They wish to escape their memories and the torment associated with them.

Memory is very important.  If you don’t learn from a bad experience, you may replay the dreaded events . . . repeatedly.

. . . when experience is not retained, as among savages, infancy is perpetual. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

George Santayana, 1905

Though attributed to Sir Winston Churchill, who improved on the original quote, George first encapsulated the importance of memory.

I have an electronic photo frame that rotates through hundreds of digital photos I loaded onto it – photos of my wife and I and our children through the course of their growing up.  Every one evokes sighs, smiles, and/or laughter as they prompt the memory of the moment.

So, it seems a trigger is important (says the infantryman).

Schools used to teach civics and personal finance.  They’ve been done away with (not everywhere) in the more ‘woke’ schools to teach inappropriate sexual practices and racial condemnation.  Children cannot remember what they have not been taught.  This is not by accident.

Prayer and Bibles were outlawed in the schools in the 1960s in order to set the stage for a curriculum shift that is more amoral and hate-filled.  Christian values generally conflict with those types of educational values.

The pledge of allegiance was done away with so that the new crop of up-and-coming adults would not be allied to the country of their birth, making change easier.  Symbols are important to activating memories.

Parades, fireworks, and other events have been minimized or even cancelled.  ‘The past is wicked, don’t celebrate it . . . let us change to something better.’  Instead of praising our forefathers and our nation for its virtues and learning from its vices, all must be condemned so that we can radically ‘build back better’ with no restraints from the vision and virtues of our founding and history.

Americans have coined numerous catch-phrases, like, “Remember the Alamo”, “Remember the Maine”, and “Remember the Titans”, but few know what they are supposed to remember concerning those phrases (Denzel probably remembers the third one).

I would venture to say that within a decade, “Never Forget” will be just another catch-phrase with no special meaning.  Our govt has given the Taliban (the folks who gave sanctuary to Al Qaeda) hundreds of billions of dollars of sophisticated weapons.  They have obviously forgotten.

Our Father wanted us to remember certain things and He set up triggers and systems to assist in that.

He wanted us to remember that there are no other gods like the one, true God, so after He showed the impotence of the many Egyptian gods through a series of plagues (each plague designed to show that each class of Egyptian god was powerless [an in-depth examination of the plagues can be found at the Berean Breadcrumbs website: Blood-in-the-Water and Fracturing-the-Faith-vol-5]), He directed the Hebrews to eat a specific meal on the night of the final plague . . . and to repeat the meal every year thereafter, on the anniversary.

Every year, for over 3500 years, millions eat a Seder meal and remember the supernatural deliverance of the nation of Israel (and the fellow sojourners) from the bondage of Egypt (Leviticus 23:5-8).  Christians that participate also remember the Passover lamb that was sacrificed 2000 years ago to deliver us from the bondage of sin.

Every year, millions inhabit temporary dwellings for eight days and remember what Yahweh did for Israel in guiding, feeding, providing water, and protecting them in the desert for forty years (Leviticus 23:33-43).  We also look forward to the day when Yeshua will lead us to a promised land that will protect us from the wrath to come.

Yahweh gave us His Law, but He personally voiced only ten of the commandments (Exodus 19:25 – 20:19) – ten that go a long way to helping man live with each other and with Him.  Interestingly enough, the one Commandment that begins with the word “remember” is the one that Christians have been taught to forget

8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. 9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: 10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: 11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

Exodus 20:8-11

If freedom is important to you, set up remembrances for you and your family to establish a heritage of freedom.  

If security is important to you, learn self-reliance and learn to protect yourself (a bullet is faster than the response time from a 911 call).  

If prosperity is important to you, teach and reinforce the values of ownership, trade, and entrepreneurship.

If the God’s Will is important to you, get in His book and learn what He has said to you.  People who tell you it is a fiction or does not apply to you have their own objective.  Your objective should be truth and your future.

If you’ve been taught your entire life (like I was) that the Old Testament, or even the whole Bible, was not written to you, then delving into its pages can appear to be intimidating.

A guide that can help (but not replace your own work) is my book, GRAFTED: Embracing Torah.  At 58 years old, I looked for a simple guide to help me and when I couldn’t find one, I wrote one.  The important thing is to get started – it is never too late.

Categories
Faith History

Morality versus Reason

The world today is much different than the one that existed when I was young.  The changes in culture and morality continue at an ever-increasing rate.

Morality is defined as:

  •   conformity to the rules of right conduct; moral or virtuous conduct.
  •   moral quality or character.
  •   a doctrine or system of morals.

Synonyms for morality include:

decencygodlinessrightness
integritygoodnessstandards
justicehonoruprightness
principleidealsethicalness
virtueincorruptibility 

Reason is defined as

  •   the mental powers concerned with forming conclusions, judgments, or inferences: Effective leadership requires a person of reason.
  •   sound judgment; good sense.
  •   normal or sound powers of mind; sanity.

Synonyms for reason include:

logicwisdomsense
reasoningintellectsoundness
brainsjudgmentsanity
comprehensionmentalityunderstanding
discernmentrationality 

One would think the two would have more in common, but they do not.  Morality is concerned with goodness and an established code.  Reason is focused on the ability of the person and the person’s capacity to improve (or not) using logic.

For thousands of years, life changed very little for the vast majority of people.  They worked, paid taxes, raised families, went to church, and seldom interacted with anyone outside their community.  They may have lived under a king or other such autocrat, but most lived under the radar of the rulers because of the limitations of their ability to control everything within the kingdom.

The invention of the printing press gave greater opportunity for people to share ideas over larger areas and assisted in bringing groups together to discuss “new” and important ideas.  The Church had sought to limit education and the expression of ideas to maintain their power.

Intellectuals began to rebel against the abuses, the immorality, and the control of monocratic rule and it subsidiary, the Catholic Church.  The “Age of Enlightenment” of the 18th century was characterized by a shift away from traditional religious forms of authority and a move towards science and rational thought.

The first complete break with the underlying authority of the church came with the French Revolution (1792-1799).  Reason replaced tradition.  Where the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution have a very clear foundation in the Word of God, The French and their “Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen” is based on their interpretation of how reasonable men should live.

The problem with the French Declaration was that it attempted to establish broad rights, but it hedged on those ‘bedrock’ rights with loopholes like “general will” (which can change at any time); “public order” (e.g., opinions are protected, unless they trouble the public opinion); and “public necessity”.

The morality of the Ten Commandments and the Torah were replaced by the beliefs of ‘reasonable people’ that changed when newer, reasonable-er people replaced the previous reasonable people. 

People of faith (especially priests and nuns) were forced to renounce their belief of a righteous God or they were tortured and murdered; The State created an idol that they called the “goddess of reason”; even the cathedral of Notre Dame was stripped of all vestiges of Christ and renamed the “Temple of Reason”.

Moral people are generally thought to be “good” people (not necessarily better people), because they believe in a code that is bigger than themselves, but who decides which code to use?

Most people will agree that society is better when we don’t murder each other (though some may differ in their opinion), steal from each other (though this is easily rationalized), lie to each other (imagine a world without the news media and politicians), or lie with each others’ spouses.  Where can we find such a code, especially since man minus a code is especially depraved.

Man never becomes much better when he writes his own code. 

In the 1800s, the theory of Evolution was embraced by the intellectual class because it offered them freedom from the ‘restrictive’ Commandments that required them to confess that there is one who is above and greater than themselves.  The Commandments dealing with human interaction were okay, but, like Costco, you cannot separate a jumbo pack – if the package has ten items, you buy all ten or none.

Nature became morality – nature cannot be moral but it is abundantly honest.  “Survival of the fittest” became the new code based on Darwin’s analogy to the selective breeding of livestock and pigeons.  The idea of breeding the farmer’s best animals with equally good stock (and not with unhealthy animals) was not a new idea in the area of agriculture, but the intellectuals now sought to improve man by selective breeding, giving birth to the Eugenics movement.  It was the reasonable solution to the limitations of nature.

Royalty had always selectively bred with other royalty, but now the idea was to eliminate inferior classes of people through sterilization and propagate an ever evolving, ever improving race of people.

In America, “Orientals, Jews and Colored People” were referred to as “weeds” by Margaret Sanger and the Eugenics movement. They sought to eliminate the scourge through a program entitled, “Planned Parenthood”.  Even today, three-quarters of their abortion clinics are adjacent to minority neighborhoods.

Hitler and the Nazis admired the work of the eugenicists and used science and technology to aid in the rapid elimination of non-Aryans.  The Nuremberg Codes eventually led to the slaughter of millions of undesirables because advancing the Aryan race became moral, based on the reasoned, proclamations of the German intellectual class (at least the ones that were not driven into exile or silenced by fear of the ‘consensus’).

The weak had to be obliterated to prevent them from corrupting the fittest.

Evolution did not cause Nazism, but Nazism could not have existed without it.

The Soviet Union (Russia) was also making great strides at eliminating its undesirables.  Communism had ushered in an intellectual ruling class that eliminated religion and its moral codes.  Survival of the fittest became an all-consuming government program, because the new leaders did not only seek to eliminate peasant threats to their power, but also threats from ambition (real and perceived) within their own ranks.

If one survived within this system, the one was, by definition, fit – until someone was able to eliminate you to achieve your level of power or to protect themselves from your level of perceived ambition.  Intellectuals, the ones who made this system possible, are not generally known to be particularly blood-thirsty, so they were among the first victims.

Stalin made himself perfectly suited to rise to the top of this slaughterhouse and he nightly signed off on huge lists of people to be imprisoned and/or killed.  The fact that they could not stop him meant that they were not the fittest and therefore needed to be eliminated.

The communist slogan of “From each according to their ability, to each according to their need”, became the rallying cry for every revolution that sought to impose their reasoned ideology.  Pol Pot in Cambodia, Fidel Castro in Cuba, Hugo Chavez in Venezula, Kim Il-sung in North Korea, Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua, and the big Kahuna, Mao in China, instituted murderous regimes that took from those with ability because of the governments’ great need.

In the 20th Century, over 100 million were put to death by bullet or starvation by the fittest within their own societies.

Evolution did not cause Communism, but Communism could not have existed without it.

The Bible and its moral code had to be eradicated.  Not just because of the rampant murder that results for implementing a Socialist or Communist regime, but also because of that pesky tenth Commandment.

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

Exodus 20:17

The following is reprinted from my book, GRAFTED: Embracing Torah concerning the tenth Commandment:

Socialism is the ideology of envy. “Don’t think it’s fair that others have more than you?” Your leaders will take what the rich have (this class of people will eventually include the not-so-rich, the “doing okay,” and finally the “barely scraping by” as the leaders drain more and more wealth from its citizens) and give it to others (the “poor”).

Socialism breaks down the entrepreneurial spirit because no one will want to work harder for more because it will be taken away. In the end, people stop working because they know that someone else’s labor will provide for them. At this point, people must be forced to work, and those who cannot produce must be eradicated because they are a drain on society (the Nazis referred to them as “useless eaters”).

This is why socialism always fails, and the results are devastatingly deadly. Everyone becomes equally miserable, except for the leaders who impose socialism but exempt themselves from its deprivations.  The only way to maintain the system is through force and murder.

Dennis Prager writes:

Because the Ten Commandments are given by God, they are absolute [moral].  People can and should argue about how to apply any of these commandments in any given situation [reason] – such as what constitutes . . . disrespect for a parent, or when taking a human life is to be defined as murder. But because they are decrees from God, only those types of debates make sense, not debates about whether they are binding.

The Ten Commandments therefore stand in direct opposition to all relativistic approaches to morality—the notion that each individual or society determines what is right or wrong. The Ten Commandments are not relative.

Objective Morality without reason is oppressive, especially self-oppressive.

Reason without morality is no standard at all.  It is based on the whims of the reasoning person in charge.

Both are necessary for a functioning society.  Morally, murder is wrong, but what constitutes murder?  A rational, reasoning society needs to define homicide, suicide, manslaughter, etc, but first, the moral code would need to establish that murder was wrong.

Belief in God is not a requirement to be a moral (good) person – many atheists are moral. Belief in God is no guarantee that a person is moral – many believers are not. Good people cannot make a good society without the moral code of a good and moral God.

It comes down to faith in a moral and good God.  The founding fathers of America had faith in a good and moral God and it is reflected in their correspondences and in our founding documents.

The French revolutionists did not share this faith and it was reflected in massive, state-sanctioned, shedding of blood (they referred to one stage of the revolution as the “Reign of Terror”).

Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Kim, Castro and EVERY socialist dictator denied the existence of God and His moral precepts.  Every one of their ‘socialist paradises’ has degenerated into enslaved societies where poverty and murder are the rule . . . every one.

Faith is not hard.  You believe that God created the world (and therefore has the authority to make rules for the life He created) or you believe that everything in the universe created itself and whatever is expedient for you is the law because you only live a short time and then you are gone.

When you look at the design of life, DNA, and the laws of science, it appears easier to believe (have faith in) that there is a Designer rather a random, unguided creation.

To continue in atheism, I would need to believe that nothing produces everything, non-life produces life, randomness produces fine-tuning, chaos produces information, unconsciousness produces consciousness, and non-reason produces reason. I simply didn’t have that much faith.

Lee Strobel

Would it not be strange if a universe without purpose accidentally created humans who are so obsessed with purpose?

Sir John Templeton

Believe in God, or don’t (I prefer you did as it has ever-lasting consequences), but if you want to live in a rational, prosperous, and good society, adopt the moral code of the God of the Bible and rationally apply it in all things.

Much more on the moral code of the Father of creation can be found in my book, GRAFTED: Embracing Torah.